Don’t you just love a cold case? We do, which is why we’re back with another dive into a failed AI company. Our Sunday editions are just banger after banger, aren’t they?

Did you know you can leave us feedback at the end, and we actually, genuinely read it all? Let us know what you thought!

-MV

What’s in store:

Read Time: 6 minutes

COLD CASE

They promised a self-driving future. It turned into a car crash.

Rewind five years to 2021, when Argo AI was one of the biggest bets in autonomous driving.

Ford and Volkswagen had poured billions into the startup, valuing it at more than $7 billion. Its 2,000-plus employees were developing Level 4 technology, which allows vehicles to drive without human intervention within specific geographic areas or predefined conditions. It was the cutting edge of driverless technology, just one step away from Level 5 - full autonomous driving in all conditions

Argo was testing across the U.S. and Europe. Robotaxis and autonomous delivery fleets appeared to be within reach. People were starting to imagine what their lives would look like with self-driving cars. It was an exciting time to be alive. 

But jump to October 2022, and it had all come crashing down. Ford pulled its funding, and Volkswagen followed suit shortly after. 

When their biggest investors slammed on the brakes, Argo had nowhere to turn.

Within days, Argo AI was shutting down. 

Now, it’s 2026, and self-driving cars are still not commercially available for personal use. Was Argo AI on the verge of cracking it, or just another tech company that couldn’t deliver? 

We’re reopening the case on a startup that had a $7 billion valuation, experienced founders, and two of the world’s largest automakers behind it, yet still couldn’t make fully autonomous driving commercially viable.

The Evidence File

To understand how Argo became one of the autonomy industry’s most expensive disappointments, we need to hop back to 2016.

Argo AI was founded by Bryan Salesky, formerly the hardware lead at Google’s self-driving program, and Peter Rander, who had worked at Uber ATG. If anyone looked qualified to build a viable self-driving company, it was them. 

So, they pitched two of the biggest names in the auto industry to get investment. 

It was a shoo-in. 

Ford committed $1 billion over five years in 2017. Volkswagen followed with an even larger deal that included $1 billion in funding, its $1.6 billion Autonomous Intelligent Driving unit, and the purchase of $500 million in Argo shares from Ford.

The deal valued Argo at more than $7 billion.

With two automotive giants behind it, Argo went pedal to the metal. It expanded testing, formed robotaxi and delivery partnerships, and continued developing its autonomous driving system. 

On paper, everything looked promising. 

The technology worked. But not broadly, reliably, or cheaply enough to support the business its investors had envisioned. 

The Crime: Mis-selling the Timeline

Argo seemed to have it all, but technical progress and commercial viability are not the same thing.

Level 4 autonomy required much more than software. Argo needed costly sensors, detailed maps, specially equipped vehicles, maintenance facilities, remote support, and human drivers for routes or weather conditions its system could not handle.

Not to mention construction zones, emergency vehicles, bad weather, unusual pedestrian behavior, and all the other unpredictable elements encountered on real roads.

Despite the tech improving, solving those problems was taking longer and costing more than expected. Ford’s original investment set a 2021 deadline for a commercial self-driving service. This deadline came and went without a single dollar of revenue from Argo, despite burning through over $1B of investment per year.

The longer the timeline stretched, the harder it became for Ford and Volkswagen to justify continuing to fund the same vision.

Argo’s mistake was overconfidence. It bet that self-driving was just around the corner, and that its investors had the patience for it to deliver. It failed to grasp that investment from capital-constrained carmakers meant that they simply didn’t have the shareholder patience for slow returns. 

Meanwhile, its competitors like Waymo were backed with something more critical than funding: time. Waymo's backer was one of the most cash-rich companies in history with no obligation to show near-term returns. The self-driving winners today were all backed by companies with much larger businesses. Self-driving was a side project for Google. It was everything to Ford and Volkswagen.

With no self-driving forthcoming, Ford eventually shifted its attention toward Level 2+ and Level 3 driver-assistance systems that could be placed in consumer vehicles and sold sooner, while Volkswagen pulled out and partnered with other companies. 

The Victims

When Ford decided to change course, Argo’s employees were the first to feel the burn.

The company had grown to more than 2,000 employees before it shut down. Some were offered positions at Ford or Volkswagen, but Argo itself ceased to exist.

Its backers also paid a steep price.

Ford recorded a $2.7 billion non-cash, pretax impairment on its Argo investment, contributing to an $827 million net loss in the third quarter of 2022. By then, Ford had reduced the carrying value of its Argo investment to just $64 million. From a $1B investment. Yikes.

The Prime Suspect

Did Argo’s founders miscalculate the finish line? Or did Ford and Volkswagen simply lose patience before the company could reach it?

The truth is that Argo’s promise wasn’t achievable without much deeper pockets. They put Ford and Volkswagen in an impossible position. 

Maybe if Google invested in Argo, we’d be summoning an Argo instead of a Waymo.

Argo was making progress, but its founders and backers underestimated the distance between demonstrating Level 4 technology and turning it into a profitable business. Argo had also failed to attract the new investors needed to keep funding the journey.

The technology wasn’t necessarily headed in the wrong direction. But Argo, Ford, and Volkswagen had all misjudged how long — and how much money — it would take to reach the finish line.

Case Status

Argo AI is gone, but its founders haven’t abandoned autonomous driving.

Bryan Salesky and Peter Rander now lead Stack AV, a company developing self-driving trucks. This time, they’re tackling a narrower problem: moving freight along more predictable routes instead of attempting to master every chaotic city street at once.

Meanwhile, self-driving cars have started reaching the public, just not in the way the industry originally promised.

Waymo now offers fully autonomous rides in more than 10 cities, while Amazon-owned Zoox has launched its purpose-built robotaxi in Las Vegas and begun serving riders in San Francisco. Tesla has had a similar rollout. All are expanding gradually, one carefully mapped city at a time.

And the brains behind Argo? Ford took nearly 500 of their engineers and formed a new self-driving company. This time, their focus is on putting Level 3 tech into vehicles they can actually sell.

Can you expect to buy a car that drives itself anywhere anytime soon?

Probably not. 

But depending on where you live, you may already be able to summon one from an app.

And that may be Argo’s real legacy. 

Want to work in AI? You can get our guide on the $100K AI jobs no one is talking about!

POLL OF THE WEEK

Full results will be at the bottom of tomorrow’s newsletter!

THIS WEEK IN AI

Exits, experiments and one very dramatic blob

OpenAI lost two senior execs before Tuesday lunch, AI agents tried to destroy each other in a lab, and Microsoft quietly made its blob mascot someone else's problem.
Also, DNA has a side hustle now.
Here's what mattered:

AI Art

Our Image of the Week

Daily Image Prompt

Submit your artwork to Mindstream →