We’re as tired of the relentless redistricting upheaval as you are, but, unfortunately, this week brought no rest for the weary.
When the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) issued its historic ruling in April gutting the Voting Rights Act, the conservative majority left open a small glimmer of hope that they might still strike down unfair maps if plaintiffs could prove intentional racial discrimination. This week, they slammed that door shut, issuing a catastrophic order allowing Alabama to use a congressional map that a federal court had just ruled was “tainted by intentional race-based discrimination.”
So much for this week. Next week, we’ll be keeping an eye on a hearing in Missouri’s lengthy battle over which congressional map is in place for the upcoming midterms. And later this month, Georgia lawmakers are set to take up redistricting for 2028.
As always, thanks for reading.
We’re starting to learn some details about Democrats’ plan to redraw New York maps in response to Trump’s redistricting war. The party will amend the New York state constitution to allow the legislature to redraw the maps mid-decade by a simple majority vote. Voters would need to approve the proposal in a referendum in November 2027. The amendment would also allow mapmakers to pursue explicitly partisan goals — like helping a political party win more seats — in redistricting.
After SCOTUS made their wildest racial gerrymander fantasies come true this April, the white plaintiffs in Callais — or officially, a group of “non-African American voters” — hardly took a beat in their mission to eliminate all Black congressional representation in Louisiana.
Odds and ends
|